Analisis Efektivitas Penagihan Pajak Melalui Surat Teguran, Surat Paksa, Dan Penyitaan Untuk Meningkatkan Penerimaan Pajak Penghasilan

Authors

  • Putri Lolita Sitepu Universitas Putera Batam
  • Sunarto Wage

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37888/bjra.v6i1.419

Keywords:

Rebuke; Coercion; confiscation; Acceptance Effectiveness

Abstract

The realization of receipt of warning letters, coercion letters and confiscation letters in Batam City has not yet reached 100%, this non-realization may be caused by the ineffective collection through warning letters, coercion and confiscation. The purpose of this study was to see whether letters of reprimand, coercion and tax confiscation were effective in increasing income tax revenue at KPP Pratama Batam Selatan. This type of research is a quantitative descriptive using data in the form of numbers for analysis through the formula of treatment effectiveness. The data source for this research is secondary data obtained from KPP Pratama South Batam. Collecting data researchers using shooting techniques. The sample used to measure the effectiveness of the ratio in this study is income tax arrears issued by forced letters and disbursement of income tax arrears from collection activities by forced letters. The results of the study partially show that the average value of the effectiveness of a coercion letter is 92%, it is included in the effective category, the average value of the effectiveness of a coercion letter is 91%, it is included in the effective category, the average value of the effectiveness of a confiscation letter is 91%, so into the effective category. Simultaneously an average value of 91% is obtained with effective criteria. In conclusion, an effective warning letter to increase income tax receipts at KPP Pratama South Batam or H1 is received, an effective coercion letter to increase income tax receipts at KPP Pratama South Batam or H2 is received, an effective confiscation letter to increase income tax receipts at KPP Pratama South Batam or H3 received, letters of reprimand, letters of coercion and effective confiscation letters to increase income tax receipts at KPP Pratama Batam Selatan or H4 are received

References

Darlini. (2019). Analisis Efektivitas Penagihan Pajak Dengan Surat Paksa Dan Kontribusinya Terhadap Penerimaan Pajak Pada Kantor Samsat Gowa. Jurnal Ekonomi Invoice Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 1(2).
Harmony. (2021). Mendapat Surat Teguran Pajak, Apa Yang Harus Dilakukan?
Hestanto. (2022). Penerimaan Pajak.
Kurniasari, P. (2016). Efektivitas Penagihan Pajak Dengan Surat Teguran Dan Surat Paksa Terhadap Penerimaan Pajak Pada Kantor Pelayanan Pajak (Kpp) Pratama Di Balikpapan. Akuntabel: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan, 13(1).
Lestari, S. H. (2021). Analisis Efektivitas Penagihan Pajak Melalui Surat Teguran, Surat Paksa, Dan Penyitaan Untuk Meningkatkan Penerimaan Pajak Penghasilan Pada Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Maros. Jurnal Analisa Akutansi Dan Perpajakan, 5(2).
Nasution, H. (2018). Analisis Efektivitas Penagihan Pajak Dengan Surat Paksa Dan Penyitaan Untuk Meningkatkan Penerimaan Pajak Pada Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Bekasi Utara. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Akuntansi, 13(2).
Oktaviani, N. (2020). Analisis Efektivitas Penagihan Tunggakan Pajak Dengan Surat Paksa Untuk Meningkatkan Penerimaan Pajak Pada Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Palembang Ilir Barat.
Sandra. (2021). Serba Serbi Penyitaan Dalam Penagihan Pajak.
Satvika. (2020). Penagihan Pajak Dengan Surat Paksa (Ppsp).
Wahdi, N. (2018). Efektivitas Penagihan Pajak Dengan Surat Teguran, Surat Paksa, Dan Penyitaan Dan Kontribusinya Terhadap Penerimaan Pajak Di Kpp Pratama Semarang Tengah Satu. Dinamika Sosial Budaya, 20(2).

Downloads

Published

2023-04-29

How to Cite

Sitepu, P. L., & Wage, S. (2023). Analisis Efektivitas Penagihan Pajak Melalui Surat Teguran, Surat Paksa, Dan Penyitaan Untuk Meningkatkan Penerimaan Pajak Penghasilan. Bongaya Journal of Research in Accounting (BJRA), 6(1), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.37888/bjra.v6i1.419